Showing posts sorted by relevance for query De Calf. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query De Calf. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, April 11, 2011

The Dream Blog

Just another one of those things, a dream or this time blog that was so vivid, I made no attempt to hold on to it. And sure enough within two steps from bed it was not so clear. Well, I will make no attempt to recapture it, instead recalling an earlier idea from the previous day. I told a buddy, there needs to be a new party. De Calf Party. But after a few minutes of his rant on current events, something stronger was called for. In related matters, we do need something that presents a stronger plan[***] to the American people and someone who bargains like Boehner.[**]
Meanwhile I think I will try this De Calf.

[The Next Big Thing: The Debt Ceiling, And Speaker Boehner says it will not be raised without something big attached. Polls show people against raising it, as well as against* raising taxes. The only thing left will be more cuts.]

* but it depends on the poll

[** 4-12-11 link and previous asterisk's links added]
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
[Opinions Excused. No Comment.]

[***]
On the other hand .
MSNBCTV Test Pattern [B... ] or Truth Out [...ingo: Bernie Sanders is not De Calf I meant but Harry Reid could be. And my hunch is that there will be a lot on the table.]

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Budget Brew Ha Ha

Bill Maher on Rachel Maddow
Earlier context.
And regarding the need for a new (De Calf) party for the fiercely independent, note that this is not an endorsement of a new party, only more people at the table. Norman Goldman in contrast to Harry Reid represents the problem with too much Calf in Nation or the nature of being heard-ed.

[The closest thing* to a "Bring 'em on!"
Partisan** Afterwords.]


*President Obama's Fiscal Policy Speech
** Demagogue is as demagogue doesn't know.

[I am wondering why Martin Bashir and Cenk Uygur are missing on the MSNBCTV page, but Dylan Ratigan had the latter on, and the former took Beck to the woodshed on being a Christian fraud.

[More Ratigan, Bashir. But where(4-14-11) isUygur]

Assessments: Rachel Maddow- A Victory for Math
Ed Schultz- A Day of Reckoning
Lawrence O'Donnell-

Thursday April 14, 2011
More on the Martin Bashir reaction to Beck.
More on President Obama's speech.
Joan Walsh- What it means to be a Democrat.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Happy Earth Day!

It's not too late.

A Faith-Based Wake-Up Call on Earth Day

by Bishop Robinson for Center for American Progress

Speaking of E. D.
[Environmental Disinformation, and Reptile Disfunction]

[Speaking of leaps... searching... this is it... from here. I have a project in the works* regarding Atlas Shrugged author Ayn Rand, but just as I finished the previous post, former Governor Gary Johnson N.M. enters the 2012 race.(Not to mention quixotic mixes.)]
[More Dylan Ratigan: Pre-Town Hall, The Koch Party, Gulf Disaster, Debt Ceiling, Bright Bart, De Deficit.]
[De Calf Party]

* A Novelist Idea: here is a post draft trailer or tease.(apparently not that novelist)

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Anac(R)onism? Election Day!

[ Hump Day ? ] 

[Post-date Re: De-Calf ]
[pardon the M-b/ed/s ! ? ]

2012 General Election Endorsements


YES

  • Referrendum 74 (marriage equality)

  • Initiative 502 (legalize+tax marijuana)

  • Advisory vote #1 (ESB6635 - close bank tax loophole)

  • Advisory vote #2 (SHB2590 - keep tank safety fee)

  • King County Prop. #1 (renew fingerprint ID funding)

  • Mercer Island Fire Station Bond
NO

  • Initiative 1185 (Tim Eyman's 1/3 rule)

  • Initiative 1240 (defund public schools)

  • SJR 8221 (clamp debt limit; stick it to local govt.)

  • SJR 8223 (allow UW/WSU speculative

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The Big Dig

Ron Paul not so much.
Mitt Romney not so much.
Newt Gingrich, deeper.

Re-Group?

NOW, was that what I was talking about? Just teasing. Or "tough surrogate"?

Not having reviewed each of the links, nevertheless here are hints to my G'Ribble.
Under "Mitt Romney" there was a hint that the debate was "on a topic that he should dominate: the economy". Hence the "ledership" of The Big Dig? Investment in infrastructure anyone?

[Then there is the Laffer Curve of Regulation Job Growth. Which is my twist on not just the misuse of the curve, but the avoidance of* regulation. Regulation could be increasing jobs, if they were not avoiding the regulations.]

*the real laugher is in the "willing to report" and the needless "math genious".

[Coffee Party / Organizing Wall Street: De Calf anyone?]